Free IP Analysis · No card required
Is Your AI Product Ready to Patent? Find Out Now
FITTIN's AI patent readiness check tells you exactly how to frame your AI invention to survive §101 scrutiny — and what prior art you need to clear.
The Problem
AI patents are frequently rejected under §101 (Alice/Mayo). Filing without understanding your eligibility wastes $15,000+ in attorney fees.
What You Get
- ✓§101 Alice/Mayo eligibility analysis for your AI invention
- ✓Technical improvement framing — how to write claims that survive rejection
- ✓Prior art landscape in your AI patent category
- ✓Filing strategy: provisional now vs. wait for more data
- ✓Attorney briefing document ready to hand off
Get My Free IP Analysis →
Professional-grade analysis · PDF + DOCX · Ready in ~2 minutes
How It Works
1
Describe your AI product's core method or process (2 min)
2
FITTIN runs §101 analysis + prior art search
3
Get a patent readiness score with specific guidance
FAQ
Are AI inventions patentable under the Alice test?
Yes, if they claim a specific technical improvement rather than an abstract idea. The key is framing the invention as solving a concrete technical problem.
What makes an AI patent strong?
Specific claims tied to technical improvements, clear disclosure of the inventive steps, and prior art clearance. Vague 'AI does X' claims are routinely rejected.
FITTIN is not a law firm. Reports are strategic IP intelligence, not legal advice.
Terms ·
NDA